(December 9, 2012 at 8:32 pm)Al-Fatihah Wrote: Response: Yet if asked how you know that these historians were eyewitnesses, your answer is "because they said so", thus you debunked yourself again. For it still relies on hearsay that the eyewitness were actually eyewitness.
Ok, for one thing, stop reposting the same thing over and over again as if it's some magic bullet...because it isn't, and simply saying something repeatedly does not make it fact...it just makes it repetitious. It's still unsubstantiated, and you did not address my point that your own claim are from nothing more than a book as well. I will assume your silence on the matter means you are keenly aware of the truth of my words and are choosing to attempt misdirection.
You also neglected to notice that I stated "historians" AS WELL AS "eyewitness accounts from still-living men who saw for themselves Hitler's rise to power." There are also visually-documented features, hundreds if not thousands, of Hitler's rise to power, how he did it, what he did, etc.
Nothing of my argument has been debunked. You have not refuted anything I have stated, only thrown up smokescreens to obfuscate what has been said.
At this point you can either practice that thing that your holy book demands (humility, modesty) and admit your argument has been torn asunder, or you can bring up an actually valid point. OR, the third option, you can have no grace, dignity, humility, or modesty at all and pretend like I never said anything and completely negate yourself not just in our eyes but in the eyes of your own god.
What's it gonna be?
