(December 9, 2012 at 9:15 pm)Al-Fatihah Wrote:(December 9, 2012 at 9:13 pm)Darkstar Wrote: You aren't making any sense. Like, ANY. Should I even respond to this? You are saying now that people lie about being historians, and that we need eyewitnesses to somehow verify that they are? But if we 'heard so', even if it is from an eyewitness (eyewitness of what, I wonder) then it is not accurate?
Response: I never stated any of the sort, supported by your inability to quote and prove otherwise. Thus it is you who is not making sense.
Al-Fatihah Wrote:Yet if asked how you know that these historians were eyewitnesses, your answer is "because they said so", thus you debunked yourself again. For it still relies on hearsay that the eyewitness were actually eyewitness.
