Quote:Response: When you can provide evidence of your claim, then it will become valid.
We have already determined that, as with jesus, there is no contemporaneous evidence for his existence in the early first century. Likewise, your boy does not begin to be noted in the record until well after his alleged death.
If you have evidence from contemporaries, feel free to present it.
If not, understand that you are using the same kind of happy horseshit that xtians use to substantiate their silly god, too. Fanicful tales written by later "believers" are not "evidence."
BTW, what kind of "god" communicates by waiting until some camel merchant is asleep in a cave and then coming to him in dreams? You'd think a "god" could come up with something a little more convincing.
