RE: Chew toy of the week
December 10, 2012 at 1:30 am
(This post was last modified: December 10, 2012 at 1:31 am by Darkstar.)
(December 10, 2012 at 1:29 am)Al-Fatihah Wrote:(December 10, 2012 at 1:25 am)Darkstar Wrote: Thus confirming that Muhammad never existed. Thanks for clarification. (You can't have it both ways)
Response: Proof of existence does not require observation, proof of physical change does. Debunked again.
Yeah, and scientists have observed evolution, so...? Speaking of which, wouldn't this supposed conquest of Muhammad's involve physical changes? So, where's the video (or anything, for that matter) proving that he did it? You have still provided no proof that Muhammad existed or that he conquered anything.