The Reasons to Believe in Yahweh

[Angrboda]

Still waiting on those reasons why you consider the evidences for Christianity categorically superior to the evidences from other religions.


And you side-stepped the question as to whether the evidence of the prophets was compelling because of them being specific men, or because what they did was miraculous.


"Totality of evidence" appears to me to be a catch phrase for "a bunch of fudge factors that I'm unwilling to name"; how is "the totality of evidence" regarding the prophets any more persuasive than the totality of evidence in the Vedas, or the argument from the five skhandas which support the Buddhist doctrine of Anatta, which itself is incompatible with your Christian doctrine.

Let's hear you cite the specific problems of credibility with regard to Buddhism that make its evidences (the totality of it) categorically inferior to the evidences for Christianity.

(And while I'm at it, feel free to point to specific evidences for the beliefs of a Shakta Hindu which you find less reliably attested than those of Christianity.)