'4)' does not follow.
William Lane Craig fails to explain, as he always does, how the first cause has to be caused by an intelligent creator. It doesn't need to be reasoned out - I mean, how does it? - whatever causes the universe in the first place, could just as easily be caused without a consciousness intending it, can it not?
Where does Craig actually evidence that a conscious intelligence has to be the first cause? IOW: Where does he prove that it cannot be done without a conscious intelligence, or a consciousness at all?
EvF
William Lane Craig fails to explain, as he always does, how the first cause has to be caused by an intelligent creator. It doesn't need to be reasoned out - I mean, how does it? - whatever causes the universe in the first place, could just as easily be caused without a consciousness intending it, can it not?
Where does Craig actually evidence that a conscious intelligence has to be the first cause? IOW: Where does he prove that it cannot be done without a conscious intelligence, or a consciousness at all?
EvF
