RE: Reasons for God
October 10, 2009 at 11:54 pm
(This post was last modified: October 10, 2009 at 11:55 pm by Oldandeasilyconfused.)
Quote:So humans are [basically] the product of one lucky monkey (out of infinity) or they were created by something that could at least imagine all the human dimensions.
False dichotomy; I said no such thing, neither does the theory of evolution.Neither are those two options the only two. EG mainstream Christianity accepts evolution,but insists on a divine first cause.It's only the lunar religious right which remains in a state of denial about evolution. (Most,like you show no signs of actually having read Darwin)
Quote:I would think that our existence is most probably designed. An accident is too improbable to expect.
"Argument from incredulity" one of the most common logical fallacies used by apologists.
Quote:The argument from personal incredulity, also known as argument from personal belief or argument from personal conviction, refers to an assertion that because one personally finds a premise unlikely or unbelievable, the premise can be assumed to be false, or alternatively that another preferred but unproven premise is true instead.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_incredulity