RE: Buddhism, against having fun.
December 16, 2012 at 6:54 pm
(This post was last modified: December 16, 2012 at 6:55 pm by Something completely different.)
(December 16, 2012 at 6:48 pm)alwayson Wrote: No, what I'm saying is that the pop understanding of karma is nothing like that in Buddhism.
ok
Quote:Sanskrit (संस्कृतम् saṃskṛtam [sə̃skɹ̩t̪əm], originally संस्कृता वाक् saṃskṛtā vāk, "refined speech"), is a historical Indo-Aryan language, the primary liturgical language of Hinduism and a literary and scholarly language in Buddhism and Jainism. Today, it is listed as one of the 22 scheduled languages of India[3] and is an official language of the state of Uttarakhand.[4] Sanskrit holds a prominent position in Indo-European studies.
The corpus of Sanskrit literature encompasses a rich tradition of poetry and drama as well as scientific, technical, philosophical and dharma texts. Sanskrit continues to be widely used as a ceremonial language in Hindu religious rituals and Buddhist practice in the forms of hymns and mantras. Spoken Sanskrit is still in use in some villages, a few traditional institutions in India and there are many attempts at further popularization.
Sanskrit.............. a language.
now point out how karma is different in buddism.
By using words which make sence and dont make you look as if you were simply using unkown words in a desperate attempt to keep a highground.
Now if you edit your posts to edit out parts of your redicilous argument, because you know that they are redicilous I dont know why this should be continued.
