(December 17, 2012 at 2:42 pm)median Wrote:(December 17, 2012 at 2:00 pm)catfish Wrote: Oh my, did you have to respond the way I expected? Deflection, check! Ad-hom, check! Goalpost shifting, check!*itallics by me to reveal a point to be addressed below*
ROFL. How predictable that you wouldn't actually answer the entire post. I'll take this as your admission of defeat, since you can't answer honestly or defend your assertions. Deflection? NOPE. I addressed it directly. Ad-hom? NOPE. I didn't argue my position was correct due to an insult. Insults are quite different from ad hominem attacks. Go back to school. Goapost? Please... You're off the topic of the OP (red-herring), talking about your dumb predictions of what people will say (red-herring), and refusing to deal with the arguments before you (dodging).
EPIC FAIL. Keep trying though...
No, my job was to demonstrate to Gooders why he was wrong in having the view that Christians believe all of HIS points... (have you not read what transpired here???)
You demonstrated the ad-hom as noted above in italics. What assertion by myself have I not defended? Show me...
While you're at it, support your assertion that I'm a "consistently dishonest and irrational debater" with some type of tangible evidence...
.
