How Christians and there god sound to me.

[median]

*itallics by me to reveal a point to be addressed below*

ROFL. How predictable that you wouldn't actually answer the entire post. I'll take this as your admission of defeat, since you can't answer honestly or defend your assertions. Deflection? NOPE. I addressed it directly. Ad-hom? NOPE. I didn't argue my position was correct due to an insult. Insults are quite different from ad hominem attacks. Go back to school. Goapost? Please... You're off the topic of the OP (red-herring), talking about your dumb predictions of what people will say (red-herring), and refusing to deal with the arguments before you (dodging).

EPIC FAIL. Keep trying though...

No, my job was to demonstrate to Gooders why he was wrong in having the view that Christians believe all of HIS points... (have you not read what transpired here???)

You demonstrated the ad-hom as noted above in italics. What assertion by myself have I not defended? Show me...

While you're at it, support your assertion that I'm a "consistently dishonest and irrational debater" with some type of tangible evidence...
.

Well, since you keep dodging, as you keep trying to shift it the burden, there is no reason for further discussion. You have been asked to defend your alleged deity (how you know said deity exists and how you know said deity has said characteristics). And all you come back with is a tangent - having nothing to do with what is being asked of you (all whilst ignoring your red-herrings, stated previously). Go back and read your post #42. Try #76 while you're at it. God pill? You believe "everything" in the OP? You've been asked to demonstrate how you know those things are real.

As was already stated, I don't care about your tangent "true Christian" nonsense. I don't care what you call yourself. I don't care if you say you believe "all of it", and then begin your interpretation of the text. Anybody can do that with their holy book. Demonstrate your deity or admit you can't.

Last, you are falsely calling "ad hom" when no such attack has been raised. Please try to stay on topic (I know this must be hard for you).

You really need to start paying attention to what people mean, and not just what you want them to mean.