There are plenty of great scientists in the world that are in some way religious. That does not discredit their work in any way, since the objectivity in science is always garantueed by peer review in the scientific method.
As for Creationism, if the scientists that do give credence to ID want to have it taught in class, they should do it as any science, by making a hypothesis, testing the hypothesis, write peer reviewed papers, have them published in a science journal, and have their tests replicated by others. Then after an agreement by most scientists in the field, there is nothing stopping creationists calling ID science.
As for Creationism, if the scientists that do give credence to ID want to have it taught in class, they should do it as any science, by making a hypothesis, testing the hypothesis, write peer reviewed papers, have them published in a science journal, and have their tests replicated by others. Then after an agreement by most scientists in the field, there is nothing stopping creationists calling ID science.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
