(January 1, 2013 at 4:46 am)Annik Wrote:(December 31, 2012 at 11:03 pm)Mark 13:13 Wrote: So Richard Dawkins when he says Jesus did exist didn't believe what he said ; in other words he lied?
It doesn't matter what Dawkins believes. I haven't said a word about him before now. What matters is the evidence. A billion people believing the sky is green does not make it so. Don't try and put words in my mouth... and if you do, at least try and make some connection to what I actually said.
I am not putting words in your mouth and you are correct " A billion people believing the sky is green does not make it so" just as i say about Gods non existence. But what i was implying that as a scientist Dawkins would demand evidence for the Historical Jesus and seems to have known that it was true that majority of reputable ancient historians are in agreement he existed otherwise he would have said otherwise. It would seem reasonable to me that if looking for the evidence of a historical Jesus then the evidence of ancient historians would be the only evidence I can give you apart from the millions of Christians that you bump into every day. What evidence would you accept ?
