Mark 13:13 Wrote:I am not putting words in your mouth and you are correct " A billion people believing the sky is green does not make it so" just as i say about Gods non existence. But what i was implying that as a scientist Dawkins would demand evidence for the Historical Jesus and seems to have known that it was true that majority of reputable ancient historians are in agreement he existed otherwise he would have said otherwise. It would seem reasonable to me that if looking for the evidence of a historical Jesus then the evidence of ancient historians would be the only evidence I can give you apart from the millions of Christians that you bump into every day. What evidence would you accept ?
How about contemporary records? A birth record? Death record? His name in writing somewhere? There aren't any that haven't been show to be written 50 years after his death (at the very earliest, 100+ years is more likely) or a fake. It is not my task to disprove God or Jesus. It is yours to prove it. You're being intellectually dishonest and logically fallacious.