Did Dawkins and Tyson say that and what are the implications.

[Welsh cake]

Dawkin's then I think realises the implication of his statement and immediately tries to say but if we can't find life it doesn't mean its not out there as it is probably to spread out for us to ever find. Surprisingly close to what we as Theists say about God but you won't take from us.

The first thing that popped into my mind was would GOD be in the category of a stupendeously improbable theory? so until life is found elsewhere?

How in the fuck did you just do that? 0____o

I have autism and ADHD, and yet even I don't change the subject with so many non-sequiturs, initially starting from theories on life on other planets, to discussing A BLOODY MAGICAL GOD, in one opening thread on the atheism board, as you just did.

If you want to talk about the Drake equation, the Fermi paradox, the Goldilocks principle, the Rare Earth hypothesis compared to its contrary principle of mediocrity/Copernican principle, then we're all ears.

Leave your magic man out of this, or start another more specific thread in the more appropriate sub-forum.