RE: Did Dawkins and Tyson say that and what are the implications.
January 4, 2013 at 7:48 am
(This post was last modified: January 4, 2013 at 8:06 am by Mark 13:13.)
(January 4, 2013 at 7:05 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote:(January 4, 2013 at 6:56 am)Mark 13:13 Wrote: Would be nice if you could actually comment on the original point of the thread see post #1 before you chuck in something completely off track. I can understand people can drift of thread but most at least attempt to deal with the issue of the thread first.
Ock, yer poor we lamb.
There is nothing to say about you OP. You misinterpreted the clip as others have shown you and you have obviously failed science 101 in high school.
Hence the sarcasm at having to educate you.
you say i misinterpreted the clip i say I havent. But then as shown earlier I was prepared to say why I have not misinterpeted it. I have misappropriated it for a purpose other than what Dawkins used it for but no I have not misinterpreted it. So would you like to deal with the question I ask using the quote as I have to raise another issue.
(January 4, 2013 at 7:46 am)Zen Badger Wrote:Now were dealing with the Supernatural and as GOD is supernatural He is not constrained by the rules of the natural and GOD is Eternal He had no beginning.(January 4, 2013 at 7:42 am)Mark 13:13 Wrote: OK explain how something can come into existence from nothing if that's natural explained by natural law. the points you put all extend from my first something so therefore can at best be seen as a natural extention of a supernatural cause.
What did god spring from then?
If something can't come from nothing
(January 3, 2013 at 5:28 pm)SkyMutt Wrote:(January 3, 2013 at 4:40 pm)Mark 13:13 Wrote: So is a Scientific Theory a fact?
I gave you an excellent brief reference which addresses this question a few pages ago in the post which you've seen fit to ignore.
sorry missed it as busy answering so many. in short I have already outlined that GOD can't be tested and why... Transedental. GOD is not a scientific theory TRUE...GOD is a philosophical theory to explain the Cosmos that Scientific theory is so good at exploring but that is totally inadequete to explore beyond. You other points have been raised in other posts since and I've dealt with. But again apologies for not responding.
(January 4, 2013 at 7:45 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote:
I see you are in full retreat and your post just says that to me. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTdMrrh9db4