RE: Did Dawkins and Tyson say that and what are the implications.
January 4, 2013 at 3:13 pm
(This post was last modified: January 4, 2013 at 3:17 pm by Welsh cake.)
(January 2, 2013 at 9:28 pm)Mark 13:13 Wrote: I'm not as smart as youIts not a question of intelligence, its a question of coherency.
Quote:i can't tell if you've given me an answer or a smoke screen to hide the fact you haven't.WTF do you mean by smoke screen? You confound the fuck out of your own OP into meaningless drivel and then you proceed to insinuate I'm trying to be intellectually dishonest for simply pointing out your baffling absurdity? You sir, are talking complete and utter rubbish.
Quote:If you have answered my questions then i missed it and would appreciate you simplifying it for me.Your "questions" did I read right? I didn't realise you were so bold as to openly bastardise the label "question" here just for the sake of playing devil's advocate, but understand this, your "questions" are non-nonsensical and dismissed as such. There are no "implications" over what Dawkins and Tyson said. The search for foreign life in our universe HAS NOTHING to do with atheism, and NOTHING to do with ontological arguments, or speculating for, the existence of god(s). Again, you are talking complete and utter rubbish.
(January 3, 2013 at 4:38 pm)Mark 13:13 Wrote: No place for probability in science mmmhYou are taking Mister Agenda's post out of context. Stop messing around.
