Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 5, 2025, 6:14 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Science and Randomness
#10
RE: Science and Randomness
(January 5, 2013 at 1:03 pm)Faith No More Wrote:
(January 5, 2013 at 11:14 am)Mark 13:13 Wrote: Can a true Scientist ever accept that at some point there will be a limit to their ability to use science to understand the mechanism of a particular event and that, that event or those events be deemed as random and from then on science will be the exploration of the patterns and laws the result from these random process." beyond this point there be monsters" Big Grin

You lost me when I got to the part I put in bold.
Trying to finds another way of putting it, If science finds a process that it can't understand the mechanism for is that then deemed as random and if it is does science believe this is a temporary state of definition as in time it will understand stand the process and therefore it will be understood. So by this thought does science in general believe in the end it can discover the mechanisms behind every process no matter how small so that
1)in the end there can be no random.. or
2) do scientists believe there will always be these random areas ( if I can define them as such for want of better words ) infinately regressing forever so there will always be in science an unknowable however small ..or
3) it will hit a definate area it can't peer into any further. or even
4) science can't answer this question

before i can explore the process of sciences and its opinion of creation
going forward I need to look at how science looks backwards and this knowledge gaps and randomness ideas i need to explore.

(January 5, 2013 at 1:12 pm)LastPoet Wrote: I might try a bite at it FNM, although it is vague:

(January 5, 2013 at 11:14 am)Mark 13:13 Wrote: Can a true Scientist ever accept that at some point there will be a limit to their ability to use science to understand the mechanism of a particular event and that, that event or those events be deemed as random and from then on science will be the exploration of the patterns and laws the result from these random process." beyond this point there be monsters" Big Grin
(Take heed to the bolded part)

You surely need to know a bit more about Math, namely dynamic chaos. For now, you could listen to this old man:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ay8OMOsf6AQ

If you can't understand what he says, you shouldn't do that affirmation.

I understood but of course then we need to find the equations, the mechanisms that determine the numbers. even such silly things as what are the pages of the cosmos that allows the shapes to evolve
( metaphor ) ps whats FNM.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 5, 2013 at 11:14 am
RE: Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 5, 2013 at 12:53 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by The Grand Nudger - January 5, 2013 at 12:37 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 5, 2013 at 12:58 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by The Grand Nudger - January 5, 2013 at 12:56 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Faith No More - January 5, 2013 at 1:03 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 5, 2013 at 2:14 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by The Grand Nudger - January 5, 2013 at 1:09 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by LastPoet - January 5, 2013 at 1:12 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by The Grand Nudger - January 5, 2013 at 2:49 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 5, 2013 at 4:32 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Psykhronic - January 5, 2013 at 4:43 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 5, 2013 at 5:27 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Aractus - January 5, 2013 at 6:23 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 5, 2013 at 6:37 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by pocaracas - January 5, 2013 at 6:52 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Aractus - January 5, 2013 at 10:06 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 5, 2013 at 10:44 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Aractus - January 5, 2013 at 10:57 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 5, 2013 at 10:58 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Faith No More - January 5, 2013 at 9:54 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by The Grand Nudger - January 5, 2013 at 10:31 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Aractus - January 5, 2013 at 10:54 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 5, 2013 at 10:55 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by The Grand Nudger - January 5, 2013 at 11:03 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 6, 2013 at 7:00 am
RE: Science and Randomness - by Zen Badger - January 6, 2013 at 7:27 am
RE: Science and Randomness - by The Grand Nudger - January 6, 2013 at 10:02 am
RE: Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 6, 2013 at 10:12 am
RE: Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 6, 2013 at 3:59 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by pocaracas - January 6, 2013 at 4:06 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 6, 2013 at 4:25 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by The Grand Nudger - January 6, 2013 at 10:15 am
RE: Science and Randomness - by The Grand Nudger - January 6, 2013 at 4:32 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 6, 2013 at 4:43 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by The Grand Nudger - January 6, 2013 at 5:15 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 6, 2013 at 5:32 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by The Grand Nudger - January 6, 2013 at 5:34 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 6, 2013 at 5:51 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by The Grand Nudger - January 6, 2013 at 6:14 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 6, 2013 at 6:34 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by The Grand Nudger - January 6, 2013 at 7:00 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 6, 2013 at 7:14 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by pocaracas - January 6, 2013 at 7:26 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 6, 2013 at 7:36 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by pocaracas - January 6, 2013 at 7:56 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by Mark 13:13 - January 6, 2013 at 8:10 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by The Grand Nudger - January 6, 2013 at 7:43 pm
RE: Science and Randomness - by The Grand Nudger - January 6, 2013 at 8:19 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  An Analisis of a Premise Linking a Creator and Science Mortalsfool 5 1358 September 1, 2024 at 7:34 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Science Channel, Jupiter, and it's moon Io. Brian37 6 2178 July 9, 2018 at 4:29 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Science, the Bible and Satan Haipule 9 3418 November 16, 2017 at 11:16 am
Last Post: John V
  The science of joy and happiness Detective L Ryuzaki 15 4966 September 7, 2015 at 4:25 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Science and Philosophy popsthebuilder 13 3696 June 25, 2015 at 6:04 am
Last Post: Alex K
  Order vs. Randomness Rayaan 100 28728 March 1, 2014 at 7:14 am
Last Post: Rayaan
  Science and the story it tells TheBeardedDude 10 3506 October 27, 2013 at 10:24 pm
Last Post: Zazzy
  Science curriculum called fascist and atheistic little_monkey 20 7033 August 18, 2013 at 1:03 pm
Last Post: Tobie
  The Science of Why We Don’t Believe Science FifthElement 23 9452 June 25, 2013 at 10:54 am
Last Post: Rahul
  Questions about God and Science Akincana Krishna dasa 95 33566 October 23, 2012 at 4:00 am
Last Post: Angrboda



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)