RE: Science and Randomness
January 6, 2013 at 6:34 pm
(This post was last modified: January 6, 2013 at 6:37 pm by Mark 13:13.)
(January 6, 2013 at 6:14 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Whether or not it's true has nothing to do with whether or not it's an axiom. There's no controversy, because it is a statement that follows logically -from- axioms.....if we're only containing it to a discussion of the system itself.
so which axioms did 1+1=2 need to be defined from or follow logically from ? Does it not stand as an axiom now as does it not meet the definition of axiom, In which way does in match the definition of an axiom.