(January 17, 2013 at 12:48 am)Rhythm Wrote: And? You may not choose to use the phrase, it's still a phrase in common use, it is intelligible and coherent. Just trying to help you understand the english language homey.
Yoo could, very accurately and very eloquently, call something you thought to be immoral a "moral act". Then you could go on to explain why this moral act -is- a moral act, and why is should be negatively valued......
(the reason that such a term is useful btw, is that it provides neutral ground in a debate over morality. If things are either moral or immoral calling them such assumes the conclusion. Not all acts would appear to have any moral value - and any given person may not wish to argue for every single potential act before continuing a debate about morality-. Get it now?)
No, I couldn't... Only a morally bankrupt and intellectually dishonest person could do that... Need I say more?
.
