(January 17, 2013 at 9:56 am)Faith No More Wrote:catfish Wrote:No, what has happened here is that you have had your thought processes dicatated to you. I will NOT call an immoral act moral while you seem to have no problem being one of the sheeple...
"freethinker" - one of the biggest lies sold to fucktards everywhere...
Let me see if I can spell this out for you, fishy...
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/moral
Quote:a : of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior : ethical <moral judgments>
b : expressing or teaching a conception of right behavior <a moral poem>
c : conforming to a standard of right behavior
d : sanctioned by or operative on one's conscience or ethical judgment <a moral obligation>
e : capable of right and wrong action <a moral agent>
You seem to think that the only definition of 'moral' is defintion C, but as you can see, the definition Rhythm has been trying to say to you is also accurate. So, he is correct in saying that an immoral act is a moral one in that an immoral act relates to the principles of right and wrong.
(BTW, in the future you might want to refrain from the insults until you are certain that you are right. It makes you look like a fucking idiot.)
You posted a definition that is clear about (a) being a "moral judgement".
Rhythm told me to google "moral act" and do you know what the first hit was? The fucking Catholic Encyclopedia. Like I would ever consider that an authority.

According the the Catholics, taking a piss is a "moral act"...
"A human act. One performed with knowledge and free will. It is called a moral act because it is always either morally good or bad. Every consciously deliberate action is therefore a moral act. "
I propose we just call those things "righteous acts", ok?

.