Religion and LGBT people

[Aractus]

You sir are a two faced hypocrite.

Well I'm sure you mean that as a compliment, so thank you Zen.

And you can chop and change the direction of the thread as much as you like but the fact remains that you said you treat gays the same as other people and since you would deny them marriage you do not.

Do you deny incestuous couples marriage? Therefore you don't treat them the same.

Now... since your pathetic attempts to derail the conversation with incest etc have failed what are you going to try now?

I'm not trying to derail the conversation, I said I wouldn't answer a loaded question at the start, why don't you learn how to read and comprehend.

---

Actually I can see what he is doing, he is questioning your use of the word "any".

And it is an interesting question, incest has an increased chance of producing deformities and other mutations BUT then so has the coupling of certain unrelated people with genetic illnesses.

So the added question is would I support restricting these peoples rights to mate?

My gut feeling to the second is no but to incest yes.

However I am not convinced that there is a large swathe of people outside of Kansas that are keen to couple with their close relatives, but I am ready to be swayed by any relevant arguments.

I think that the gays have now made their case and I for one support their rights.

Zen do you agree or disagree with this?