RE: Who’s been a naughty cyclist?
January 20, 2013 at 5:17 am
(This post was last modified: January 20, 2013 at 5:22 am by Aractus.)
^ Not quite. 
The report that originally outed Armstrong was a journalistic piece by Walsh and Kimmage which tied the 1999 re-tested results to Armstrong by obtaining his sample numbers from the UCI. The lab, however, produced the results without knowing who the samples belonged to, they found some samples with EPO and many without. All of Armstrongs samples from that year were positive. Armstrong sued the paper for libel in 2006, they are now counter-suing the sonofabitch.
The report that originally outed Armstrong was a journalistic piece by Walsh and Kimmage which tied the 1999 re-tested results to Armstrong by obtaining his sample numbers from the UCI. The lab, however, produced the results without knowing who the samples belonged to, they found some samples with EPO and many without. All of Armstrongs samples from that year were positive. Armstrong sued the paper for libel in 2006, they are now counter-suing the sonofabitch.
