(January 30, 2013 at 9:13 pm)catfish Wrote: Since you don't have evidence... BULLSHIT!!!
Seriously man, think of what you just did there, get back to me if you can resolve that, mmm'kay?
If I am lacking evidence, why don't you provide it?
I think what we are now discussing is what each of us considers a compelling standard of evidence. Photographic technology didn't exist at the time Jesus was supposed to have existed. There are also no first hand accounts of his ministry; not one.
I can quickly provide first hand testimonies and photographs of Big Foot, the Loch Ness Monster, and chupacabra. Based on your standard of evidence you must consider the above existent animal species or admit that your belief in the existence of Jesus is based on some non-evidential criteria.
