(February 6, 2013 at 6:20 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:If Hyksos refugees eventually merged with the Israelites,
Bible-thumpers aside, current archaeological evidence has led to this:
http://rense.com/general12/decon.htm
Quote:The Exodus from Egypt, the wanderings in the desert and Mount Sinai: The many Egyptian documents that we have make no mention of the Israelites' presence in Egypt and are also silent about the events of the Exodus. Many documents do mention the custom of nomadic shepherds to enter Egypt during periods of drought and hunger and to camp at the edges of the Nile Delta. However, this was not a solitary phenomenon: such events occurred frequently over thousands of years and were hardly exceptional. Generations of researchers tried to locate Mount Sinai and the encampments of the tribes in the desert. Despite these intensive efforts, not even one site has been found that can match the biblical account.
The power of tradition has now led some researchers to 'discover' Mount Sinai in the northern Hijaz or, as already mentioned, at Mount Karkoum in the Negev. The central events in the history of the Israelites are not corroborated in documents external to the Bible or in archaeological findings. Most historians today agree that at best, the stay in Egypt and the exodus events occurred among a few families and that their private story was expanded and 'nationalized' to fit the needs of theological ideology.
Ze'ev Herzog's 1999 article in Haaretz which led to fundies shitting their pants everywhere!
Yea like Oz shit at the sight of Toto, it's not polite to pull back the curtain.
