(February 8, 2013 at 5:00 pm)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote: I'm looking at one right now...Yep, the definitions generally note that it's used of a man for the first definition, and give a second which applies to inanimate objects.
"(of a man) having or showing characteristics regarded as typical of a woman; unmanly."
Quote:And that's all it says before it goes into origins and alternate forms.The etymology being "to make a woman of," which of course indicates it's referring to a man.
Quote:It's been used for many a year TYPICALLY for males (and inanimate objects)...Yep, just like I said.
Quote:but it's base use has always existed,Base being to make a woman of, as noted above.
Quote:and it's being increasingly used by butch ladies into other butch ladies as a put-down for 'lipstick lesbians'.Special usage by a tiny minority.
Quote:Again, I intentionally put foppish in there for you to have a field day with, and you ignored itI know. Nothing stops you from using a word - e.g. woman or feminine - outside of its commonly understood meaning.I totally agree that its usual usage is "(of a man)"... but that doesn't stop me from recognizing its use outside of such


I totally agree that its usual usage is "(of a man)"... but that doesn't stop me from recognizing its use outside of such 