Collaboration with theists?

[Violet]

Saerules blew up for good reason. But even so, is wasn't because of some atheist conviction. It was because of her conviction that all people deserve respect and equality regardless of differences. So, I don't know why she feels her actions were representative of "negative atheism." Her behavior had nothing to do with atheism whatsoever.

True, but as I directed a number of statements toward the kind of god that could support such evil... it could be partially interpreted as such I think that that 'negative atheism' is a term defined differently by many people (although I agree with both you and Evie on this, I still hold open the possibility that an atheist might exist like Pippy defined).

I wouldn't call you a 'negative atheist' either... I do think you are a zealot for atheism and humanism though

But I have a question... Do you think that "nurturing hate for homosexuals with a view to disenfranchise them" is a legitimate right of theists as part of their free exercise of religion?

No, I do not... which is why I said this (before citing an example [depends on interpretation really] of what one might call 'toe-treading' on 'theistic rights?'):

What legitimate rights, might I ask?