RE: God is above conventional reason
February 14, 2013 at 10:22 am
(This post was last modified: February 14, 2013 at 10:35 am by WinterHold.)
I agree with you.
One problem is that the concept of science itself is not understood probably by many people. Science is the studying of a natural phenomena, its core but not its reason or why it behaves like that.
The atom is the best example. Until this day nobody would answer you -scientifically- why the atom exists, why it behaves like that. Nobody would also tell you why the human heart beats, why that electricity is there.
http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/113/23/2775.full
a person like me would tell you that the human heart is so categorized & stuffed with numerous technologies which proves a mighty craftsmanship, I would also tell you that the CPU(MicroProcessor) is an invention because it is categorized in a way which proves creation, I would tell you also that it has the same concept of the human brain : memory, the ability to perform operations according to previous experiences.
another person would tell you that the human brain is not like that, and it's natural & a result of evolution. Just like a person who would tell you that the microprocessor is an alien technology from outer space... weird !
It is why I believe that the issue of god is something that a human must solve with his/her own mind without any kind of prior feelings or emotions about the subject.
When I came back to my religion, I remember starting to read by myself without any external intervention. Eventually it would all go to your logic, what you want and what you think about the world.
It is above conventional reason. And I'm a person who believes in science in any other field. But in this one pricelessly : science is not the best approach to prove god.
One problem is that the concept of science itself is not understood probably by many people. Science is the studying of a natural phenomena, its core but not its reason or why it behaves like that.
The atom is the best example. Until this day nobody would answer you -scientifically- why the atom exists, why it behaves like that. Nobody would also tell you why the human heart beats, why that electricity is there.
http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/113/23/2775.full
a person like me would tell you that the human heart is so categorized & stuffed with numerous technologies which proves a mighty craftsmanship, I would also tell you that the CPU(MicroProcessor) is an invention because it is categorized in a way which proves creation, I would tell you also that it has the same concept of the human brain : memory, the ability to perform operations according to previous experiences.
another person would tell you that the human brain is not like that, and it's natural & a result of evolution. Just like a person who would tell you that the microprocessor is an alien technology from outer space... weird !
It is why I believe that the issue of god is something that a human must solve with his/her own mind without any kind of prior feelings or emotions about the subject.
When I came back to my religion, I remember starting to read by myself without any external intervention. Eventually it would all go to your logic, what you want and what you think about the world.
It is above conventional reason. And I'm a person who believes in science in any other field. But in this one pricelessly : science is not the best approach to prove god.