(February 14, 2013 at 11:57 am)Minimalist Wrote: There is no more evidence for "abraham" than there is for "moses," "jesus," "mohammed," or the "man in the moon."
You don't get to define one fictional character by piously referring to another.
And it still misses the point that a work of fiction, say Peter Pan, the original book mentions London, does not mean little boys can fly or fairies exist.
So even if tomorrow we discovered the bones of Jesus(common name back then but besides the point) it still would not make magic babies or zombie gods true.
"Mohammed existed" I get that from Muslims of course, but all that means is a guy started a cult and convinced others that he had a cosmic bat phone to Allah. It still would not make Allah real.
We can prove that George Washington existed but no sane person would claim he could fart a Lamborghini out of his ass.