(February 19, 2013 at 12:37 pm)John V Wrote:(February 19, 2013 at 11:46 am)Esquilax Wrote: Well, the science. I believe a link was left a few pages back. http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2...120612.phpHere's a longer write-up on that article which notes that it's just a hypothesis at this point:
There's another one, maybe it's the same one.
By feminization of males and masculinization of females, the researchers are referring to “gonad-trait discordance,” which indicates that a person’s genitals and sexual preference aren’t in line with what is generally considered “normal.” The authors also cite two other androgen-influenced traits (cryptorchidism and hypospadias) that may be related to sex-specific epi-marks. However, “may” is the key word, since none of these hypotheses have been tested with real data.
In the end, that’s where the paper leaves us: with an untested hypothesis that appears to fit the statistical frequencies and inheritance patterns of homosexuality. The researchers use a mathematical formula to illustrate that this type of epigenetic inheritance could occur, but the paper is purely theoretical rather than data-driven, and it refers to remarkably few human studies.
Quote:But there's also a logical issue that you don't seem to be getting: if it's a choice, then you should be able to change it, right? Like, right now? But you and I both know that's not how people work.Here's a longitudinal study of women over ten years in which 2/3 of them changed their self-identity, and 1/3 changed it two or more times.
Can you change your orientation at will?
If you believe it, question it. If you question it, get an answer. If you have an answer, does that answer satisfy reality? Does it satisfy you? Probably not. For no one else will agree with you, not really.