(February 19, 2013 at 1:49 pm)Question Mark Wrote: He just pointed out that the book you cited had been discredited by other sources, and most significantly in my opinion, that the research was likely very biased because it was sponsored by an organisation that wishes to see intrinsic homosexuality proven false. You can't take something on face value when it obviously has an agenda.1. Are you claiming that peer review can't weed out biased studies?
If you could cite any book or any research, or anything else as evidence simply because it exists, then we'd believe the bible.
2. The first study I gave hasn't been attacked.
