RE: Women. You have men by the balls.(...)
February 23, 2013 at 12:34 pm
(This post was last modified: February 23, 2013 at 12:36 pm by John V.)
Edited to add: Rhythm edited his post while I was making this response.
(February 23, 2013 at 12:23 pm)Rhythm Wrote: My point has been clear from the beginning, that you spoke directly out of your ass. Sexual dimorphism is not synonymous with subservience.I didn't claim that the two are synonymous. you're speaking directly out of your ass.
Quote:Nor does evolution "make" anything happen, it is a description of a process that is the sum total of the reminder of what survives and how that influences future generations.True, but evolutionists frequently speak as if evolution has a purpose. If I were to start pointing out such instances, you guys would say I was being pedantic.
Quote:You made a statement, you have not supported that statement, and the statement itself arises from a profound misunderstanding of the very subject the statement invokes as an explanation.What profound misunderstanding is that? Unless you're disputing that evolution can RESULT IN differences in behavior between the sexes of a species, then your objection is that I may have exaggerated the case, not that there is a profound misunderstanding.