Pope Allegedly Sought Immunity For Abuse Crimes Just Before Resigning update

[Cato]

Note that the threat title uses the big give-away word - "allegedly".

Such words can essentially be taken to mean "this story is not true".

This betrays your pliable standard of evidence for belief.

Lets assume that Ratzinger was charged and convicted for complicity in covering up the actions of child abusing priests. Let's further assume that only second hand hearsay was submitted as evidence. You would cry foul and throw a fit. I would agree in a strict legal sense.

Yet, you believe and accept as fact the resurrection and ascension of Jesus Christ based on flimsier testimony.