(March 1, 2013 at 12:02 am)Drich Wrote: did you read the definations of those two words? Do they fit anyone who insists on calling themselves Atheists?
If I wanted to just name call, don't you think I would have included some of your screen names, and started to call some of you out? What I have done is shine a little light on the work that is done under the title of atheism. Not all of it fits, I have freely shared information that allows the indivisual to make up his own mind as to who's works are atheistic in nature or maybe Miso/dystheistic..
One would think that a 'true thinker ' would not bock at hard facts and evidence that promotes Actual Independant thought.
Ah, I forgot, you need this explained to you every step of the way: you aren't actually the judge of who is or isn't things. The individual in question is. I've noticed you do this a lot, labelling people based on your interpretation of their actions and then expecting that label to stick, but... no, just no.
Like I've said earlier, don't go flinging names around without consent, if you're trying to describe someone's belief system, because you're bound to get it wrong. Someone's actions might not match up with their beliefs, but beliefs are independent from action; people doing evil generally don't believe themselves bad guys, after all. All you have to go on is appearances, you can't see inside someone else's head to ascertain what they think and feel. Just chill out and let us tell you what we think about, because to do anything else is just rude.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!