RE: what being apart from the law means.
March 1, 2013 at 9:55 pm
(This post was last modified: March 1, 2013 at 10:10 pm by Drich.)
(March 1, 2013 at 6:39 pm)Ryantology Wrote:then why can't all interpretations be wrong?(March 1, 2013 at 6:18 pm)Drich Wrote: ..and why can we all (the majority) be right?
Too many conflicts.
Your interpretation of Christianity is certainly not mainstream.
(March 1, 2013 at 8:45 pm)FallentoReason Wrote: Very amusing tactic using someone else's words. Check this out though:the academic world refers to that "tactic" you identified as a quote. that is why i gave the name of the person who originally said it and posted a link to where that message could be found. this process is known as listing a reference.
Quote:Once again, you place QM's method in its own category away from yours, because "no true A/S/Ker would use a method other than..":another red herring. we were talking about the proper usage of the no Scotsman fallacy. if you remembered ii told you not to go down this road unless you researched it.. i even let it go a few times and you like a dumbass could not leave well enough lone. now it is time for you to eat some poop before we move on. i need you tto say Drich was right and i was wrong before we can move on.