RE: Children/Teenagers Viewing Pornography
November 10, 2009 at 4:01 pm
(This post was last modified: November 10, 2009 at 4:02 pm by Tails Turrosaki.)
(November 10, 2009 at 11:02 am)Meatball Wrote:(November 9, 2009 at 7:39 pm)Tails Turrosaki Wrote: The law shouldn't have say in what we watch and shouldn't watch. They do not have permission to control our brains...
So you're OK with distribution, possession, and viewing of child pornography? Snuff films?
Sure. I don't see the problem (unless you're talking about children in pornographies, then I see the problem).
I mean, I'm just a person, so obviously my opinion is different from everybody else's. But think of it like this:
If children/teens viewing pornography is illegal, neither people who don't care if their child watches it, nor people who care if their child watches it, will let their children view it. It's a win:lose situation.
If children/teens viewing pornography is legal, people who don't care if their child watches it will let them watch it. People who care if their child watches it won't let them watch it. It's a win:win situation.
In the end, there will be parents who say "NO" to it. But really... Have we done an experiment to see is pornography affects us?
Have we? Really?
No, I doubt it. We haven't gather 100 children, allow 50 of them to watch pornography and 50 to not watch it, wait for them to grow up with these same allowances and then gather the results. So we just don't know. Overall, pornography should be allowed to everyone.
╔═╪══╬═╦╦═╬══╪═╗
║♫ ♪ ♫ ♪ McGodless! ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫ ║
║ Bah-bah-bah-bah-bahhh~!║
║♪ ♫ ♪ ♫ I'm lovin' it! ♫ ♪ ♫ ♪║
╚═╪══╬═╩╩═╬══╪═╝
║♫ ♪ ♫ ♪ McGodless! ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫ ║
║ Bah-bah-bah-bah-bahhh~!║
║♪ ♫ ♪ ♫ I'm lovin' it! ♫ ♪ ♫ ♪║
╚═╪══╬═╩╩═╬══╪═╝
"And God said, drunk, 'Let there be Tails Turrosaki,' and there was Tails."