Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 7, 2024, 12:53 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Science v Religion"
#22
RE: "Science v Religion"
Quote:I can't say I find this terribly compelling, given that aspects of it still clash with the origin stories of all religious doctrines; since we can trace the genetic lineage of humanity back to proto-human animals that are vastly different from, say, the creation account of Adam and Eve in both the form of the initial life forms and the mechanism of their original creation, then christianity would have to relinquish its deathgrip on the concept of original sin, and all that follows on from that.

I guess what I'm saying is, you can't get to any specific god from that concept, and in fact you'd be contradicting more than a few.
The specific objective that led me to say that was to show that science doesn't contradict with the bible, as was the subject of the thread. By no means do I base my beliefs on the theory of pre-creation... no one should. All the bible says about this is:
1) There was land, and there was water before God's creative acts in Gen 1
2) Angels were there before God's creative acts in Gen 1
so, my point was (without any excitement or imagination) we cannot make big claims about how science contradicts with God when the fact is, so little is said about it... so there are much better places to look for proof of or against God's existence. My point was merely to show they don't contradict. That is all.
As for the rest, I can't connect with your string of arguments...:
--I wasn't saying that Adam and Eve were proto-human animals at all!?
--I know I can't get to any specific God with that concept- I don't base my beliefs on gaps.
--I don't recall any clashes of doctrine (not that I believe in anyway; there are so many weird ideas out there, I'm not surprised you said that)

Quote: You'd be getting to a non denominational deistic god, in the end.
Although I hope what I wrote previously explains why I don't believe this- I still would just like to say another thing:
"in the end" I just want to know the truth- and become absolutely sure of it! . I joined these forums to give atheism some decent consideration (I do pay attention to atheist sites, books and shows- but they haven't yet done the trick for me; I also have plenty of reasons for my current belief in the bible- but I'll only start threads when I get a decent amount of time).
I'm kinda busy and don't have much time for these forums, so if you respond to this post, don't expect me to reply immediately- but I will try to get back to you sometime.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
"Science v Religion" - by Gabriel Syme - March 4, 2013 at 6:20 pm
RE: "Science v Religion" - by Gabriel Syme - March 5, 2013 at 4:50 pm
RE: "Science v Religion" - by paulpablo - March 4, 2013 at 6:30 pm
RE: "Science v Religion" - by Darkstar - March 4, 2013 at 6:52 pm
RE: "Science v Religion" - by Angrboda - March 4, 2013 at 7:01 pm
RE: "Science v Religion" - by jap23 - March 5, 2013 at 8:21 am
RE: "Science v Religion" - by Esquilax - March 5, 2013 at 1:30 pm
RE: "Science v Religion" - by ManMachine - March 5, 2013 at 6:50 pm
RE: "Science v Religion" - by jap23 - March 6, 2013 at 3:25 am
RE: "Science v Religion" - by Esquilax - March 6, 2013 at 4:43 am
RE: "Science v Religion" - by jap23 - March 6, 2013 at 8:03 am
RE: "Science v Religion" - by Esquilax - March 6, 2013 at 8:16 am
RE: "Science v Religion" - by ManMachine - March 5, 2013 at 9:04 am
RE: "Science v Religion" - by KichigaiNeko - March 5, 2013 at 9:19 am
RE: "Science v Religion" - by jstrodel - March 5, 2013 at 8:51 pm
RE: "Science v Religion" - by pocaracas - March 5, 2013 at 8:56 pm
RE: "Science v Religion" - by downbeatplumb - March 5, 2013 at 2:09 pm
RE: "Science v Religion" - by Gabriel Syme - March 5, 2013 at 5:55 pm
RE: "Science v Religion" - by KichigaiNeko - March 6, 2013 at 5:01 am
RE: "Science v Religion" - by jap23 - March 7, 2013 at 8:53 am
RE: "Science v Religion" - by PyroManiac - March 7, 2013 at 10:44 am
RE: "Science v Religion" - by EGross - March 7, 2013 at 10:56 am
RE: "Science v Religion" - by Gonzalo697 - March 9, 2013 at 8:53 pm
RE: "Science v Religion" - by ATL - March 12, 2013 at 9:46 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Religion and Science are 1000% Opposite causal code 497 109327 October 25, 2017 at 8:04 am
Last Post: I_am_not_mafia
  Religion and Science are 1000% Opposite causal code 0 465 September 13, 2017 at 1:48 am
Last Post: causal code
  Religion hurts homosexuality but homosexuality kills religion? RozKek 43 11128 March 30, 2016 at 2:46 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Terrorism has no religion but religion brings terrorism. Islam is NOT peaceful. bussta33 13 5017 January 16, 2016 at 8:25 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Religion's affect outside of religion Heat 67 20103 September 28, 2015 at 9:45 pm
Last Post: TheRocketSurgeon
Rainbow Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion" CristW 288 50891 November 21, 2014 at 4:09 pm
Last Post: DramaQueen
  Bridging the Divide Between Science and Religion Mudhammam 3 1864 November 11, 2014 at 1:59 am
Last Post: Mudhammam
  Science and Religion cannot overlap. Mudhammam 97 12339 August 12, 2014 at 8:17 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Science Vs. Religion (Cute version) NoraBrimstone 12 2612 November 30, 2013 at 3:42 pm
Last Post: Mothonis
  Religion conflicting with science Bad Wolf 30 10551 October 15, 2013 at 11:35 pm
Last Post: ThomM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)