(March 7, 2013 at 8:03 pm)mo66 Wrote:(March 7, 2013 at 8:02 pm)paulpablo Wrote:Your views on warfare are exactly the same as the Qur'an's view on it as you admitted before
Not even worth replying to, I think you're actually joking, you can't be intellectually serious when making this statement.
Ok I'll bother to destroy your argument. Just because I'm bored.
1
My views on the entire quran aren't in complete agreement because i agree with attacking hitler in ww2.
2
ww2 Didn't use the laws within the quran on either side at any point, buildings were destroyed, men women and children were all attacked, on each side.
3
The quran talks about killing polytheists and disbelievers how does that fit into ww2.
4
If any group in history made it known that they were abiding by the laws of the quran all people fighting them would have to do is send an army of women, or just hide in buildings, since muslims are (supposedly) not allowed to attack women or damage buildings, so as an actual strategy in military terms it would be suicide.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
