(March 8, 2013 at 11:22 pm)genkaus Wrote:(March 8, 2013 at 11:08 pm)catfish Wrote: Because you guys seem to have a priority of morals which seem to contradict. Life is life and you guys seem to have no problem allowing someone to extinguish it yet voice an objection to a person's reason why.
How are you not getting this? A free and autonomous life is prioritized over plain old survival. We can judge a person's reasons for an actions all we want, we can object to them, disapprove of them, call them immoral but as long as it does not infringe upon another free and autonomous life - we have no say in them.
And this is what I object to... You define what is acceptable to abort, yet somehow don't realise that that "free and autonomous life" is the same life that started at conception.
Do you also object to life support?
.