(March 12, 2013 at 1:03 am)genkaus Wrote:(March 12, 2013 at 12:28 am)catfish Wrote: No "and"...
It's funny as Hades though... lol
So, in conclusion, you haven't even been able to justify why a fetus should be considered an "individual human", let alone why it should be afforded any rights or why those rights should supersede those of the mother's. So, you can't even justify why abortion is immoral, much less why it should be illegal.
I don't have to "justify" anything. I had to show that you claiming the moral highground against the selection of sex was weird and illogical...
1. You refuse to acknowledge the individuality of a fetus or zygote.
2. Someone in this thread actually supported abortion up to the momemnt of birth.
3. You equate a fetus as being no more important than a hair.
4. You don't object to hair selection by color.
5. By your logic, a woman could abort based on color, but not sex.
It's just plain weird...
