RE: Toaster strudel alliance takes on drugs, atheists and liberalism
March 15, 2013 at 5:57 am
(This post was last modified: March 15, 2013 at 6:02 am by Creed of Heresy.)
(March 14, 2013 at 8:46 pm)jstrodel Wrote:(March 14, 2013 at 4:08 pm)Creed of Heresy Wrote: So, Strodel, you just said that left wing politics were destructive and then went on to say that left wing agendas brought forth some of the greatest scientists and thinkers of our time, influence much of the motivation behind scientific progress, and were largely responsible for the opening of sexuality.
So...what was destructive about them, again...?
Well, the people who are teaching you history are liberals and left wing people. How well can you rate achievements? The left has only been in existence for 200-250 years, something like that, maybe earlier. Liberals want to mention the fact that Einstein was a socialist, of course, to boost their movement. What is the relationship between Einstein's achievements and the rest of mankind's deepest thinkers? There have been plenty that havn't been socialists.
I would not say that science traces back to the atheist movement, it traces back to people like Locke and Bacon and Newton and Gallileo and Copernicus. Most of the early scientists were Christian. The left was like a movement to kick the Christians out of the universities. Harvard used to be Christian. Jonathan Edwards was president at Princeton at one time. Oxford has a long Christian history.
Basically what happened was that in the 19th century massive numbers of people starting following people like Freud (arguably, offered very few lasting contributions), Marx (mostly discredited), Nietzsche (argued essentially that pride was a virtue, unsurprising that he was popular) etc instead of following God. The modern atheist movement traces back to this.
As for the opening of sexuality, are you referring to the devaluing of children, the acceptance of promiscuity and the mass sexual objectification of woman in popular culture?
I'm hearing a lot of what sounds like the Sobbing Sovereign. "We were once in power, we had it all! And then the lefties took it ALL AWAY FROM US! That means they're BAD! They're all BAD because WE were in power and now we're NOT! WAHHHH!" First of all, everything you just attempted was little more than a poison-the-well attempt, secondly; devaluing of children? Uh, buddy, your religion is the one that has a very gruesome history involved with crusaders spearing and hanging and torturing and enslaving children all throughout the crusades with wanton abandon. It also has a very bloody history with a fixation on stories involving the raping, enslaving, and murder of children just for the crime of not being of your religion, stories your religion relived in history. And same with the women; women are objectified in the bible far more than in society. They're literally described as if they're property to be bought and paid for and sold off on a whim. The bible sounds like a guide to prostitution of your daughter or wife more than it does anything else. And what is wrong with promiscuity? That's kind of human nature. We weren't created to stick with one person and produce offspring with just them, we, like all animals, were meant to fuck and fuck and fuck as much as we could. That's kind of the ultimate goal of life is to spread its genes and diversify the population. And what, you think that being chaste and "pure" and "faithful" is REALLY so god-damn good? Well what about those SUPER chaste nuns and bishops and cardinals, raping each other [in the case of the nuns] or the choir boys [bishops, cardinals]? Considering that they live a very LIFE, vowed upon chastity, you'd think that'd be GOOD and they'd be strong and wholesome, if we follow your logic but OH LOOK there's a huge number of them who are child molesting pedophiles! It's ALMOST LIKE IF YOU REPRESS YOUR SEXUAL URGES FOR TOO LONG IT TURNS TO DEVIANCY BECAUSE HUMAN BEINGS WEREN'T MADE TO BE CHASTE VIRGINS WHILE SURROUNDED BY THINGS TO FUCK! You nimrod. Christianity had a domination over everything for 1700 years; are you REALLY trying to call Liberal Educational Elitism here for them having the universities for the last hundred or so? Cuz buddy, I gotta tell ya...that makes you an irredeemable twat.