RE: Atheists, the death penalty and abortion...
March 16, 2013 at 3:52 pm
(This post was last modified: March 16, 2013 at 3:53 pm by CleanShavenJesus.)
(March 16, 2013 at 3:44 pm)catfish Wrote:(March 16, 2013 at 3:36 pm)CleanShavenJesus Wrote: No, I think you're the one who said "Tue Human TM", which I don't particularly understand. It's a form of mockery, I got that.
What I said, though, was that it was not an individual human being because of the fetus' dependency on the mother. It is not individual. It is living and feeding off of another person. That is literally the opposite of the word "individual".
So, no, the fetus is not an individual human.
Here is what you said: (bolded to highlight your fallacy)
Quote:Human beings must, by definition, be separate individuals. Fetuses depend on and reside inside of a mother. They do not gain the status of human being by virtue of living inside the body of another human being.
Therefore, by that logic, it becomes a true human being when it no longer needs to depend on the nutrients inside the mother/reside in the mother.
Yes, I said the words "true human being". What's your point?
catfish Wrote:So what is it while it resides in the mother? Please say a fish...
A human fucking fetus. How difficult is this for you?
ronedee Wrote:Science doesn't have a good explaination for water
![[Image: YAAgdMk.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2FYAAgdMk.gif)