(November 16, 2009 at 1:03 pm)Saerules Wrote:(November 15, 2009 at 1:01 am)Dotard Wrote: And sorry, his house his rules. His house, he has the right to be a bigot within. Don't like it? Move.
What if the person can't move though? IE: Everyone who could afford to move in Iraq already has. Plenty of people would like to get out of the situation.... but just how many can't afford to do so?
Its an ethical dilemma. If he has a right to be a bigot, because it is his house... then everyone else living inside it has the right to rebel against his despotism, leave, or suffer through it needlessly.
You could apply the same logic to a king and his castle... He's allowed to work his people like dogs. He's allowed to charge ridiculous taxes. He's allowed to burn all the books in the library that conflict with his own beliefs, simply because the castle belongs to him.