(March 19, 2013 at 5:51 am)Aractus Wrote:(March 17, 2013 at 1:41 am)teaearlgreyhot Wrote: I used that as example to demonstrate that rape has obvious sexual aspects. It turns some people on.Bullshit. That kind of pornography is no more "legitimate" than the child porn that Denmark produced - in fact it's even less legitimate because when the Danish made child porn at leas they didn't portray it as being "non consensual" or "violent"!!!!! Yes you heard me right the USA produced "pseudo rape" and "violent" pornography is WORSE than the Danish child porn, without question, without doubt. The fact that it isn't stigmatised the way child porn is in your culture tells me something about that US culture.
Um... but how does any of that refute the notion that both...- um, genres, maybe?- or porn exist for sexual gratification? Whether or not you find them repulsive, the fact that they exist and are pornography that is consumed implies that someone is getting off on them. Which was TEGH's point to begin with.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
