[quote='Rhythm' pid='417579' dateline='1363741984']...determining what is or is not "a priori" knowledge has a long history, and the things we've filled that category with have changed over time. Some things once considered "a priori" are know known to be completely in error...[quote]Previous scientific theories were wrong, therefore scientific theories are not valid. I don't think so.
[quote='Rhythm' pid='417579' dateline='1363741984']Should I have to? It's your baby, do work. I simply mentioned that the notion of an inherently orderly universe is not a presupposition. Not for me anyway, is it presupposition for you? How so?[/quote]Should you? Yes you should. It is an axiom, a self-evident truth. It stands so long as you are unable to show that it is not an axiom. And if you dismiss the notion of an inherently orderly universe that makes you an absurdist. Which also means that you are absurd and unworthy of engaging in rational discussion.
[quote='Rhythm' pid='417579' dateline='1363741984']Should I have to? It's your baby, do work. I simply mentioned that the notion of an inherently orderly universe is not a presupposition. Not for me anyway, is it presupposition for you? How so?[/quote]Should you? Yes you should. It is an axiom, a self-evident truth. It stands so long as you are unable to show that it is not an axiom. And if you dismiss the notion of an inherently orderly universe that makes you an absurdist. Which also means that you are absurd and unworthy of engaging in rational discussion.
