(March 23, 2013 at 1:15 pm)jstrodel Wrote: Science is 40-55% theistic, it may be even higher than that.Science is 0% theistic, scientists on the other hand, may be theists.
(March 23, 2013 at 1:15 pm)jstrodel Wrote: I didn't see a single point in there, typical for atheists, that deals with the fact that perhaps a majority of scientists are theists.Don't you think this would be a point against your argument? If so many scientists are theists, why haven't they proven god yet? What happened to the "atheist agenda" of science?
(March 23, 2013 at 1:15 pm)jstrodel Wrote: Atheists typically feel no responsibility to deal with facts that exist outside of their worldview. That is why the person posting did not care to deal with the statistics that I have posted in other threads that refute the false idea that science is largely atheistic. If there is a majority of agnostics and atheists in science, it is a razor thin majority.So are we finally going to decide whether it is 20-30%, 40-60%, or 80-90% of atheists that are punk rocker Marxist liberal fascists?
(March 23, 2013 at 1:15 pm)jstrodel Wrote: If you are saying abiogenesis disproves Christianity, that is laughable. Richard Dawkins himself admitted that the origin of life could be spores sown on earth from outer space.Taken out of context:
(March 23, 2013 at 1:15 pm)jstrodel Wrote: Anyone who considers abiogenesis to present problems with theistic belief is obviously deluded as to the epistemological status of abiogenesis.Well, not theistic specifically. It could be a deistic god, for instance.
John Adams Wrote:The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.
