RE: Science and religion
March 24, 2013 at 2:49 am
(This post was last modified: March 24, 2013 at 2:51 am by jstrodel.)
Argument from authority - you are blind if you think that exposing the "contradictions" in the way someone defines a miracle is a real philosophical argument.
You are defining a miracle in terms of the "laws of nature". That is such an amateurish, culturally biased approach to understanding miracles that presupposes so much metaphysics. You are seriously begging the question, as well as arguing from a very dubious authority.
You are defining a miracle in terms of the "laws of nature". That is such an amateurish, culturally biased approach to understanding miracles that presupposes so much metaphysics. You are seriously begging the question, as well as arguing from a very dubious authority.
