(March 24, 2013 at 11:57 am)catfish Wrote:(March 24, 2013 at 11:41 am)FallentoReason Wrote:
I wasn't using absolutes when I was talking about the most logical interpretation. If you actually bothered to read my entire post, you would have realised that I reasoned my way in order to state that a literal reading is more logical than a metaphorical interpretation, NOT that it is [absolutely] logical, like you're forcing it to be. After all, a "logical interpretation" in absolute terms is an oxymoron when it comes to the Bible.
I read your entire post. You based you conclusion on "apparent intricate relationship" blah blah blah.... citing genealogy... How's that "literal" interpretation working for your genealogies?
Funny? Absolutely! This don't make sense so it must be "more logical". Reasoned? I highly doubt it...
DA FUQ...?
For the love of Odin, you are absolutely impossible. Goodnight catfish.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle