James Randi can keep his millions. But the efficacy theology as a valid human intellectual endeavor is a valid question. And the answer to that question will decide if two thousand years of scholastic exegesis, tradition and the faith of 2 billion 'Christians' are wholly in error? . . . And no longer just a rhetorical question for mud slinging between atheist and religious, we are on the threshold of finding out!
History has its first literal, testable and fully demonstrable proof for faith and it's on the web. And having studied and now in the process of testing this proof for myself, I can say unequivocally that the origins of this Proof and teaching are not of human intellectual origin. A teaching that is predicated upon confirmation by direct intervention into the natural world by omnipotent power could only have been 'revealed'. As a newbie, I'm not allowed to post links, But anyone can just Google 'The Final Freedoms'.
History has its first literal, testable and fully demonstrable proof for faith and it's on the web. And having studied and now in the process of testing this proof for myself, I can say unequivocally that the origins of this Proof and teaching are not of human intellectual origin. A teaching that is predicated upon confirmation by direct intervention into the natural world by omnipotent power could only have been 'revealed'. As a newbie, I'm not allowed to post links, But anyone can just Google 'The Final Freedoms'.
Theology only exists because nothing has been revealed . . . until now!