Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 31, 2025, 12:17 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Creationist offers $10,000 to anyone willing to challenge literal interpretation of Genesis in court
#37
RE: Creationist offers $10,000 to anyone willing to challenge literal interpretation of Genesis in court
Bats can already see in daylight. Some bats actually rely on their sight and live daylight lives. They have wholly different eyes than their nocturnal cousins. It's not just the software, it's the hardware too.

Yes, cats can see very well at night - why can't bats? You do realize that your comment about cats and their fur explains - in a very dramatic way- why you're ignorant remarks about bats and their eyes are so laughable, right? Cats do end up ingesting alot of fur - but they don't get better at digesting it just because this happens. Nocturnal bats -can- see, they do use their eyes at night, but they don't get any better at it just because they do. Similarly, some megachiroptera have wonderful eyesight - they can even see in color, but they still won't fly on a dark night.

I'd like to remind you, since we're doing the normal meandering, that this all began as you attempted to separate environmental from evolutionary. I'm still waiting to hear back on that one - but I'm happy to drive forward and clear up any other misconceptions you have about the subject (which look to be massive) as well.

The particular trouble you seem to be having here, is that you've somehow incorrectly identified a bats nocturnal lifestyle as -the reason- that their eyes did not develop like say - our eyes (or more mysteriously, the cats eyes). You seem to be of the opinion that doing something a whole lot fuels adaptation. Again, both bats and cats do a their thing at night - one has wonderfully developed night vision - the other does not. You seem to think that being able to see better is a simple issue of say -turning on a light-. The notion that bats would be able to see better if they just had a candle in their caves is ridiculous. They would be able to see no better than their biology already allows, no better than they already can - in other words...they wouldn't be able to see any better at all. It's a biological barrier. It's not uniform, because some bats -do- have well developed eyes.....you've put the cart before the horse. The bats with well developed sight have this characteristic not because living a daylight life makes their eyes "work better", but because having well developed eyes allows them to live more successful daylight lives.

To put this a simpler way - in case you still don't understand- no amount of climbing trees will turn you into a chimpanzee - and that's what we're talking about with regards to nocturnal or diurnal bats, and their respective eyesight. Two species in the same order.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Creationist offers $10,000 to anyone willing to challenge literal interpretation of Genesis in court - by The Grand Nudger - April 1, 2013 at 9:01 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Serious] A Literal Bible. Answering questions Green Diogenes 101 13995 May 10, 2022 at 11:14 am
Last Post: Jehanne
  Interpretation of scripture Silver 51 10470 September 6, 2021 at 11:51 am
Last Post: Spongebob
  [Serious] Literal and Not Literal Belacqua 440 81468 December 23, 2019 at 12:42 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Genesis 26:8 Fake Messiah 20 3827 January 22, 2019 at 1:20 pm
Last Post: Drich
  A critical thinking challenge Silver 18 6426 June 15, 2018 at 12:09 pm
Last Post: Drich
  A challenge to anyone I guess! Mystic 27 6840 June 10, 2018 at 3:48 pm
Last Post: Mystic
  Christian genesis notimportant1234 45 20463 October 16, 2017 at 11:44 am
Last Post: Harry Nevis
  Should Theists have the burden of proof at the police and court? Vast Vision 16 6461 July 10, 2017 at 1:34 pm
Last Post: Jesster
  Margaret Court -another moron. ignoramus 13 4860 June 25, 2017 at 8:16 pm
Last Post: Astonished
  Liberalism's Great Challenge? Minimalist 20 4983 September 10, 2016 at 2:39 pm
Last Post: Jehanne



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)