(April 1, 2013 at 11:13 pm)catfish Wrote: You so funny. They're not gills, never were and and never will be. Read your link.
(and, it may not have been you, but some people did insist that an embryo is/was a fish...)
A question for anyone who dares to answer. Is it unlawful to restrict marriage to only allow a man and woman to marry?
.
As much as it pains me, you are right.
I just looked it up again, the "gills" seen on the fetus in it`s early childhood are not reminants of gills and the darwinian interpretation is wrong. Yet I did pick that up in highschool, so I am certain that my schoolbooks must have been outdate.
Still, a 3 month old fetus does not have the right to destry it`s mothers life.
